My latest piece is the first in a planned series of articles in which I will explore the “Cities 2.0″ transformations that are re-shaping the fabric and topography of America’s urban centers.
This initial article, which was published in the Chicago Sun Times, focuses on the impact of today’s “Generation 2.0″ cohort of 25-to-34-year-olds and particularly points to
- Ways in which today’s “re-invented” Gen 2.0 demographic definitely is not your father’s 25-to-34-year-olds.
- How a convergence of powerful forces has spurred Gen 2.0 to concentrate in central cities at unprecedented levels, and
- The impact that this generation is having on Chicago and other U.S. cities.
In fact, these changes in our urban centers connect very directly and in important ways to the changes in the U.S. economy that are placing a higher priority on innovation…and to recurring themes addressed by this blog.
Here’s a link to a JPG version of CHICAGO 2.0: A new generation reinvents Chicago as it appeared in the Sun Times on page 2 of the Sunday Op-Ed section a couple of days ago (Nov. 11). I’m including the JPG because the editor of the section, Tom McNamee, created terrific graphics to go with the piece and gave it a generous amount of real estate — full size, the package of article and graphics was just over 11″x17.”
For at least the next few days, you also can find an online version of the piece (with the complete text, but without the accompanying charts and great graphics) at
CHICAGO 2.0: A new generation reinvents Chicago
In addition, here are links to two of my previous pieces that address related issues and that provide somewhat different perspectives on these topics.
- “A Few Minutes With…Richard Florida,” a Q&A interview about the “Creative Class” that I did with economist Richard Florida that appeared last year in REALTOR Magazine, the monthly magazine of the National Association Realtors.
- My “Gold-Collar Workers” Op-Ed piece that I wrote about “human capital trends” for Crain’s Chicago Business almost 20 years ago (June 1989). To be sure, there are parts of the piece that I would change if I were writing it today, but I am willing to argue that its notions about “gold-collar workers” and the “NBA-ization” of the economy still have significant relevance to today’s challenges and opportunities.